Legal Liability of Fintech Lending Platforms Regarding Debt Collection Practices Against Borrowers

Authors

  • Tata Eliestiana Dyah A Universitas Terbuka Mataram
  • Jamaludin Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Nusa Tenggara Barat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i6.3698

Keywords:

Legal Liability, Fintech Lending, Debt Collection, Debtor

Abstract

Abstract

Debt collection practices within fintech lending services in Indonesia continue to raise legal issues, particularly when collection involves pressure, intimidation, the misuse of personal data, or the involvement of third parties to the detriment of the debtor. This study aims to analyze the legal framework governing the liability of fintech lending providers regarding debt collection practices and to formulate a legal liability construct for fintech lending platforms concerning collection practices that harm debtors. This is a normative legal study employing statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches. Legal materials comprising primary, secondary, and tertiary sources were gathered through literature review and analyzed qualitatively using legal interpretation to examine the interplay between norms governing fintech lending, consumer protection, and personal data protection. The findings indicate that the legal framework for fintech lending provider liability in debt collection is anchored in OJK Regulation (POJK) Number 40 of 2024 concerning Information Technology-Based Joint Funding Services and OJK Regulation (POJK) Number 22 of 2023 concerning Consumer and Public Protection in the Financial Services Sector. The legal liability construct for fintech lending platforms arises from their roles as electronic system operators, personal data controllers, service mechanism administrators, and entities capable of collaborating with debt collectors. Platforms cannot absolve themselves of liability if collection is conducted unlawfully, even when such actions are carried out by third parties. This liability encompasses preventive, corrective, and repressive measures to ensure that debt collection activities remain within the boundaries of law, ethics, consumer protection, and personal data protection.

References

Anggraini, N. F., & Wiraguna, S. A. (2025). Tanggung Jawab Hukum Platform Pinjaman Online terhadap Penyalahgunaan dan Penyebaran Data Pribadi Konsumen secara Ilegal. RISOMA : Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora Dan Pendidikan, 3(3), 144–167. https://doi.org/10.62383/RISOMA.V3I3.767

Budi Raharjo. (2021). FINTECH: Teknologi Finansial Perbankan Digital. Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik.

Citra, D., Putri, P., & Lutfianti, A. (2024). Peran Teknologi Finansial FinTech dalam Mengubah Layanan Perbankan Tradisional. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 2(4), 3032–6591. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14067398

Dzahabi, F., Nugraha, E., & Citra, H. (2025). Perlindungan Konsumen terhadap Fintech Lending dan Penagihan Tidak Etis. Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 1(4), 394–398. https://jurnal.globalscients.com/index.php/jkhpk

Febrianti, N., & Lubis, F. (2024). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR AKIBAT WANPRESTASI DEBITUR PADA PEMBIAYAAN BERBASIS PEER TO PEER LANDING SYARIAH PERSPEKTIF POJK NO. 22 TAHUN 2023. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.56370/JHLG.V5I2.780

Giantama, A. N., & Kholil, M. (2020). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN HUKUM PENYEDIA PLATFORM TERHADAP BARANG YANG MELANGGAR MEREK DALAM MARKETPLACE. Jurnal Privat Law, 8(1), 21–27. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/privatlaw/article/view/40358

Hattingh Akobiarek, S., Renata Pungus, K., Arden Kusuma, R., Alexius Alfa Mulya, C., & Aprilia, I. (2025). Sanksi bagi Penyelenggara Pinjaman Daring Legal yang Tidak Mematuhi Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. LPPM Universitas Sains Dan Teknologi Komputer, Vol 3 No.(2), 1–12. https://journal.stekom.ac.id/index.php/Jaksa

Hijrah, N., Arief, H. M., & Rugaiyah. (2025). PELAKSANAAN PEMBERIAN KREDIT BERBASIS FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY PEER TO PEER LENDING PADA USAHA MIKRO KECIL MENENGAH (UMKM) DI LOLI PESUA. Jurnal Al-Mashadir : Ilmu Hukum Dan Ekonomi Islam, 7(1), 50–57. https://jurnalfaiunisa.com/index.php/JAM/article/view/36

Hudani, S. A., & Kurniawan. (2024). Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan Financial Technology (Fintech) Terhadap Kesalahan Transaksi Dalam Peer To Peer Lending. Commerce Law, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/COMMERCELAW.V4I1.4231

Humaidi; dkk. (2024). Manajemen Bisnis di Era Digital. Yayasan Putra Adi Dharma.

IBRAHIM, E. R. (2025). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PENERIMA PINJAMAN BERBASIS ONLINE (PEER TO PEER LENDING) DALAM TRANSAKSI PINJAM MEMINJAM UANG. Ganec Swara, 19(1), 292–297. https://doi.org/10.59896/gara.v19i1.218

Kartika, R. (2019). ANALISIS PEER TO PEER LENDING DI INDONESIA. AKUNTABILITAS: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Ekonomi, 11(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.35457/akuntabilitas.v11i2.902

Lasmana, J. A., Efendi, I. I., Mareta, I. R., Dini, F., & Nafida, K. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Data Pribadi Pengguna dalam Proses Penagihan oleh Penyelenggara Peer-to-Peer Lending Berbasis PayLater. Begawan Abioso, 16(2), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.37893/abioso.v16i2.1237

Layanan Pendanaan Bersama Berbasis Teknologi Informasi. (n.d.). Retrieved May 9, 2026, from https://ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/Pages/POJK-40-Tahun-2024-Layanan-Pendanaan-Bersama-Berbasis-Teknologi-Informasi.aspx?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Leo, C., Gurning, Y., & Septina Basani, C. (2025). Analisis Penegakan Hukum dan Perlindungan Konsumen terhadap Praktik Penagihan dalam Layanan Pendanaan Bersama Berbasis Teknologi Informasi. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(12). https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i12.2101

Lestari, N., Febrinayanti Dantes, K., Ayu, G., & Hadi, A. (2026). TINJAUAN YURIDIS MEKANISME RESTRUKTURISASI PEMBIAYAAN LAYANAN FINTECH PEER TO PEER LENDING BERDASARKAN POJK NO. 10/POJK.05/2022 TENTANG LAYANAN PENDANAAN BERSAMA BERBASIS TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI. Jurnal Pacta Sunt Servanda, 7(1), 37–45. https://ejournal2.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JPSS/article/view/7049

Mustofa, G., Prawesthi, W., Marwiyah, S., & Aribawa, M. Y. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi terhadap Pengguna Jasa Debt Collector dalam Melakukan Penagihan Pinjaman Online. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 4(10), 2366–2387. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v4i10.4612

Ni Putu Yuliana Kemalasari & I Nengah Pasek Suryawan. (2025). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KEPADA KORBAN NON DEBITUR DALAM PENAGIHAN PINJAMAN ONLINE. Jurnal Aktual Justice, 2(1), 94–109. https://hr.djinggamedia.com/index.php/aktualjustice/article/view/541%0Ahttps://hr.djinggamedia.com/index.php/aktualjustice/article/download/541/524

Noor, A., Wulandari, D., & Afif, A.-S. M. (2023). Regulating Fintech Lending in Indonesia: A Study of Regulation of Financial Services Authority No. 10/POJK.05/2022. Qubahan Academic Journal, 3(4), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.48161/QAJ.V3N4A156

OJK Terima 56.620 Pengaduan Konsumen Sepanjang 2025, Pinjol Ilegal Dominan. (n.d.). Retrieved March 6, 2026, from https://keuangan.kontan.co.id/news/ojk-terima-56620-pengaduan-konsumen-sepanjang-2025-pinjol-ilegal-dominan

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2011). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana.

Purba, D. S., Dwi Permatasari, P., Tanjung, N., Rahayu, P., Fitriani, R., Wulandari, S., Universitas, ), Negeri, I., Utara, S., Muslim, U., & Al Washliyah, N. (2025). Analisis Perkembangan Ekonomi Digital dalam Meningkatkan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Indonesia. Jurnal Masharif Al-Syariah: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.30651/jms.v10i1.25367

Putra, M. A. L. & M. F. M. (2022). Peer To Peer (P2P) Lending: Hubungan Hukum Para Pihak, Gagal Bayar, Dan Legalitas. Jurnal USM Law Review, 5(1), 188–204.

Putri, Y., Silaban, P., Erviantono, T., & Noak, A. (2025). Regulasi Pinjaman Online Dalam Seojk Nomor 19 Tahun 2023 Perspektif Ekonomi Politik: Peran Negara Dalam Mengatur Pinjaman Online di Indonesia. Triwikrama: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 11(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.9963/6C2YD126

Rustam, M. R. (2025). TANGGUNG JAWAB HUKUM PLATFORM FINTECH PER TO PEER LENDING TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNAAN DATA PRIBADI NASABAH BERDASARKAN UU NO. 27 TAHUN 2022 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN DATA PRIBADI. IBLAM LAW REVIEW, 5(2), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.52249/ILR.V5I2.636

Siti Nurhaliza. (2024). ANALISIS MEKANISME PENAGIHAN PINJAMAN ONLINE (PINJOL) DITINJAU DARI PERATURAN OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN RI NOMOR 10 /POJK.05/2022 TENTANG LAYANAN PENDANAAN BERSAMA BERBASIS TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI. JCI: Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah, 3(9), 70–80.

Sitompul, M. G. (2018). Urgensi Legalitas Financial Technology (Fintech): Peer to Peer (P2p) Lending Di Indonesia. Jurnal Yuridis UNAJA, 1(2), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.5281/JYU.V1I2.428

Yambo, D. G., Marsyuni, L., & Aswari, A. (2025). Kekuatan Hukum Perjanjian Pinjam Meminjam Uang Berbasis Teknologi Informasi. LEGAL DIALOGICA, 1(1), 1–13. https://jurnal.fh.umi.ac.id/index.php/legal/article/view/1570

Z, T. K., Nasution, M. L., & haradhi, zilmi. (2022). TANGGUNG JAWAB PENYELENGGARAAN LAYANAN PEER TO PEER LENDING TERHADAP PEMBERI DAN PENERIMA PINJAMAN. Recht Studiosum Law Review, 1(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.32734/RSLR.V1I1.9254

Downloads

Published

2026-09-06

How to Cite

Dyah A, T. E., & Jamaludin. (2026). Legal Liability of Fintech Lending Platforms Regarding Debt Collection Practices Against Borrowers. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(6), 4662–4673. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i6.3698